Pattern: 3 hats
Pattern: 3 hats
| Summary |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status | alpha | Confidence | 3 | ||
| details... | Group | Planet team
|
|||
Problem
Stories (narratives) are a powerful form of capturing, structuring and sharing knowledge. Storytelling is a sskilled craft with flow and form, and inexperienced story writers may find it hard to express their knowledge lucidly is this medium:- They may feel too insecure or inconfident to simply tell a story, and may drift into terse descriptive phrases, preaching or promotional mode.
- Often they take their setting for granted, and fail to provide a description which would allow readers to contextualise the story adequately.
- Might gloss over inconvenient details.
- Feel constrained by their audience.
- Reluctant to criticise
- Attribute misunderstanding to their own faults
- Skim the story rather than consider it attentively
Context
Co-located collaborative knowledge sharing activities. i.e.- Learners are present in the same place and time
- Learning is driven by sharing learners' personal experiences / observations.
Solution
(high res version of illustration)Instruct learners to work in groups of 3-5. In each group,
- One learner tells a story
- A second writes it using the collaborative authoring tool
- A third will later use this write-up for presenting the story to the larger group.
Preferably, the tool should include a template to provide soft scaffolding.
A story is complete when all participants feel that the presenter has enough in the write-up to be able to present the story accurately.
Once the group is satisfied with the outcome they change roles and repeat. (sequence diagram from http://www.websequencediagrams.com
Related Patterns
list other patterns related to this one, under categories such as component, assisting, conflicting, uses this, etc.
Uses:
Support
* Source and Additional Supporting Cases
Source Case (chosen from Case Studies)
Other Cases (chosen from Case Studies)
- PED 2  
Links to External Case Stories & Examples
* Rationale (theoretical justification)
Theoretical justification.
One of the ideas underlying this pattern would seem to be that of ‘teach back’ ( in which one person teaches another what they have learned) – a fundamental concept of Pask’s (1975) conversational approach to teaching and learning, and incorporated in Laurillard’s (2002) framework in the activity of presentation of concepts by teachers to learners, and by learners to teachers as well as to one another. In terms of Black and Wiliam's (2009) theory of formative feedback, this is an example of key strategy 2 ‘Engineering effective class-room discussions and other learning tasks that elicit evidence of student understanding’. The pattern also implies high levels of implicit learner self-regulation (Nichol, 2008) in that the 3-way production of the story involves ongoing reassessment and refinement of the content in order to 'make sense' within the group. The demands of 'teach back' require each group member to take responsibility for their part in ensuring that the story is coherent, communicable and works as a learning tool for others, initially at intra-group level and then in terms of the whole class.* Verification (Solutions that were derived from this pattern)
Scenarios / solutions which were developed using this pattern.
Notes, Links and References
Liabilities, potential risks, extensions, expected side-effects
======= Related ========1.1.1.1 Uses:
- Narrative Spaces
- Soft Scaffolding
======= END Related ========
======= Rationale ========
One of the ideas underlying this pattern would seem to be that of ‘teach back’ ( in which one person teaches another what they have learned) – a fundamental concept of Pask’s (1975) conversational approach to teaching and learning, and incorporated in Laurillard’s (2002) framework in the activity of presentation of concepts by teachers to learners, and by learners to teachers as well as to one another.
======= END Rationale ========
Licensing

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.

